By Dr. Tim Orr
In today’s polarized world, Islam occupies a central place in many public discussions, particularly surrounding immigration, national security, and religious freedom. As evangelicals, we must engage with these issues carefully, avoiding irrational fear and naïve idealism. Two trends dominate the conversation about Islam: Islamophobia on the conservative right and Islamophilia on the progressive left. Both pose challenges in how we think about Islam and engage with Muslims. For Christians, navigating between these extremes is critical if we bear faithful witness to the gospel and respond to Islam in a manner that reflects both truth and love. We must approach these discussions with both theological clarity and a deep sense of compassion. As followers of Christ, our engagement must aim for reconciliation and a deeper understanding of the people we encounter.
Islamophobia: A Problem on the Conservative Right
Islamophobia, particularly prevalent in conservative and right-wing circles, often arises from legitimate concerns about national security, terrorism, and the role of radical Islamic ideologies. Terrorist attacks carried out by groups like ISIS or Al-Qaeda, which claim to act in the name of Islam, have created a climate of fear. This fear is compounded by the growing visibility of Islamic communities in the West and the perception that Islamic values might be at odds with Western democratic principles. While these concerns should not be ignored, they must also be framed to encourage understanding rather than division. Evangelicals must remember that fear can easily distort our witness if we do not consciously rely on God’s peace and seek to engage others with grace.
However, while there are valid reasons to be concerned about radical Islamism and its impact on societies, Islamophobia often goes beyond legitimate critique. It can devolve into blanket assumptions that all Muslims are a threat or that Islam as a whole is inherently violent. Such broad generalizations are not only factually incorrect but also unbiblical. Muslims, like all people, are created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27), and to treat them with suspicion or hostility based solely on their faith is to violate the command to love our neighbors (Matthew 22:39). Failing to make this distinction can hinder evangelicals from engaging with Muslims in meaningful ways. The challenge lies in balancing vigilance about radical ideologies while extending Christ’s love and truth to individual Muslims.
Evangelicals must distinguish between critiquing Islamic ideology, particularly when it conflicts with human rights and Christian values, and fostering fear or prejudice against Muslim individuals. Islamophobia compromises our witness to the gospel by reinforcing division rather than encouraging understanding and engagement. Jesus calls us to be salt and light (Matthew 5:13-16), not to foster hostility but to build bridges and seek opportunities to share the love of Christ with Muslims. This approach requires us to address fear with faith and respond to cultural tensions with Christ-like humility. In doing so, we can create the conditions for gospel-centered relationships that might otherwise be hindered by fear and misunderstanding.
Islamophilia: An Equal Problem on the Progressive Left
On the other side of the spectrum, Islamophilia, which is most commonly found on the progressive left, presents an equally troubling dynamic. Islamophilia is an uncritical, often romanticized, defense of Islam that tends to ignore or excuse the problematic aspects of Islamic teachings, especially when they come into conflict with Western values such as freedom of speech, women’s rights, and religious freedom. By failing to address these tensions, Islamophilia can undermine efforts to seek true justice and equality for all.
This form of Islamophilia often arises out of a desire to defend Islam as a minority religion, especially in the context of Western countries where Muslims face discrimination. While defending Muslims from unjust treatment is both righteous and necessary, Islamophilia goes further by refusing to acknowledge the harmful effects of Islamic law (Sharia) when it is implemented in governance. Issues such as the persecution of Christians, gender inequality, and the repression of free speech in Islamic-majority countries are either downplayed or ignored in the name of tolerance and cultural relativism. Without confronting these realities, the broader goal of justice becomes distorted. It is vital for Christians, particularly on the progressive left, to recognize that true advocacy for the marginalized must include a critical engagement with all ideologies, including Islam.
For instance, progressives who champion LGBTQ+ rights or gender equality in the West may hesitate to criticize countries governed by Islamic law, where such rights are often violated. This inconsistency is a result of Islamophilia, where the desire to defend Islam from perceived bigotry leads to willful ignorance of its more troubling doctrines and practices. Such selective critique reveals the limitations of a purely relativistic approach to human rights. Evangelicals must be mindful of these inconsistencies and speak boldly for the truth, even when it is uncomfortable or politically unpopular.
As evangelicals, we believe that truth and love must go hand in hand (Ephesians 4:15). While it is essential to defend the human dignity of Muslims, we must not ignore the harmful consequences of Islamic law when it is applied in society. Defending human rights and critiquing Islamic governance, where it leads to oppression, are not forms of bigotry—they are necessary actions for anyone who seeks justice and truth. Islamophilia can create a dangerous blind spot where Christians fail to advocate for those who are oppressed by Islamic regimes, particularly our brothers and sisters in Christ. Standing for truth requires courage and a commitment to upholding the gospel in every context. We are called to speak the truth in love, ensuring that our defense of justice aligns with the principles of God’s kingdom.
A Balanced Evangelical Response
Evangelicals' challenge is navigating a middle ground between these two extremes. Both Islamophobia and Islamophilia distort our understanding of Islam and impede meaningful engagement with Muslim communities. As followers of Christ, our goal is not to fall into fear or romanticization but to approach Muslims with both truth and love, as modeled by Jesus himself. By focusing on the person of Jesus, we can embody a response that is both truthful and compassionate. In doing so, we witness the gospel's reconciling power, which transcends cultural and religious barriers.
Evangelicals must be willing to critique Islamic teachings where they conflict with biblical principles, but we must do so without demonizing Muslims or perpetuating stereotypes. We are called to defend the rights and dignity of all people, including Muslims, while also speaking the truth about issues like religious persecution, women's rights, and freedom of speech. This balanced approach helps to avoid the pitfalls of both Islamophobia and Islamophilia. As ambassadors of Christ, we must ensure our critiques are fair, measured, and rooted in love. Engaging critically without hostility allows us to remain faithful to our calling while fostering opportunities for transformative conversations.
One practical way for evangelicals to engage with Islam and Muslims is through dialogue and relationship-building. Building bridges with Muslim neighbors can foster mutual understanding and address misconceptions on both sides. This opens up opportunities to share the gospel in respectful and grounded in love ways. Through relational engagement, we can create spaces for authentic conversations that reflect Christ's heart. In these conversations, we should aim to listen as much as we speak, learning from one another’s experiences while sharing the gospel’s hope.
At the same time, evangelicals must also be prepared to speak out against injustices where Islamic governance leads to oppression or violates human rights. This requires wisdom and discernment, but it is necessary for Christians who are called to pursue justice (Micah 6:8) and stand for truth (John 8:32). Our role as Christians is not only to bring spiritual truth but also to advocate for justice and mercy. In speaking up, we align ourselves with God’s heart for justice, ensuring that our actions reflect the holistic nature of the gospel.
In conclusion, the evangelical response to Islam should be one that carefully balances love and truth. It should reject the fear-mongering of Islamophobia while avoiding the blind spots of Islamophilia. Instead, evangelicals should seek to engage with Muslims in a way that reflects Christ’s command to love our neighbors and proclaim the gospel's truth. Through this balanced and faithful witness, we can address the complex challenges of Islam in today’s world while bearing the light of Christ’s love and truth. We can offer a hopeful vision of peace and reconciliation by holding fast to biblical truth and extending love to all people. Ultimately, this balanced approach allows us to engage the world with a gospel-centered perspective that transforms lives and communities.
The ideas in this blog are mine but AI-assisted.
Tim Orr is an Evangelical minister, conference speaker, and interfaith consultant with over 30 years of experience in cross-cultural ministry. He holds six degrees, including a master’s in Islamic studies from the Islamic College in London. Tim taught Religious Studies for 17 years at Indiana University Columbus and is now a Congregations and Polarization Project research associate. He has spoken at universities, including Oxford, and mosques throughout the U.K. His research focuses on American Evangelicalism, Islamic antisemitism, and Islamic feminism, and he has published widely, including three books.
Sign up for Dr. Tim Orr's Blog
Dr. Tim Orr isn't just your average academic—he's a passionate advocate for interreligious dialogue, a seasoned academic, and an ordained Evangelical minister with a unique vision.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.